Written By George D. Verlander
446
fatal casualties. 446 fallen comrades. 446 families that have lost a father,
mother, brother, sister, husband, wife, son or daughter.
This
number threatens to increase with every second we are at war.
'446'
is the number of deaths that have tragically occurred since the British Army
first arrived in Afghanistan, over a decade ago now, in October 2001. The
most recent fallen hero has been confirmed, Sergeant Major Ian Fisher from
Barking, London, who served in the 3rd Battalion, The Mercian Regiment as a
Warrant Officer. He was killed on the 5th of November 2013, as a result of a
vehicle-bourne suicide attack whilst out on patrol.
However,
it seems that even if you're blessed enough to have the chance to put down your
weapon, and return home to the country that you have risked your life for,
you're never out of the war-zone. The dangerous life-threatening environment
can alter into a political battle, as seen in recent news regarding 'Marine A',
and his possible life sentence after killing a Taliban insurgent.
The
event, which took place on 15th September 2011, has recently been discovered
and brought to the intention of the British Government and British Judicial
System, who now will decide whether or not the 'accused', a Sergeant in the
Royal Marines, should be punished for his actions. The 'execution', as
some have described it, was in fact taped on film from another soldier's head
camera, only known as 'Marine B' - who has since been released of all charges
and admitted back to military duty. Although the video itself has been
withheld, deemed too disturbing to distribute via news channels, a voice
recording has been released that highlights the sequence of events.
After
finding the Taliban insurgent in a field, dying from wounds recieved from an
Apache helicopter's gunfire, 'Marine A' proceeds to take out his 9mm pistol. He
then shoots the man dead. From the voice recording it is clear that after this
'Marine A' states, "There, shuffle off this mortal coil... It's nothing
you wouldn't do to us." The same Marine then follows this up with "Obviously
this doesn't go anywhere fellas. I just broke the Geneva convention", to which
'Marine B,’ replies "Roger mate."
'The
Geneva Convention' (1929) was signed at Geneva on July 27th, 1929. Its
official name is 'The Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of
War',
which was entered into force on the 19th June 1931.
Prisoners
of war MUST be:
-Treated
humanely with respect for their persons and their honor.
-Enabled
to inform their next of kin and the Central Prisoners of War Agency (ICRC, the
International Red Cross) of their capture.
-
Allowed to correspond regularly with relatives and to receive relief parcels.
-
Allowed to keep their clothes, feeding utensils and personal effects.
-
Supplied with adequate food and clothing.
-
Provided with quarters not inferior to those of their captor's troops.
-
Given the medical care their state of health demands.
-
Paid for any work they do.
-
Repatriated if certified seriously ill or wounded, (but they must not resume
active military duties afterwards).
-
Quickly released and repatriated when hostilities cease.
Prisoners
of war must NOT be:
-
Compelled to give any information other than their name, age, rank and service
number.
-
Deprived of money or valuables without a receipt (and these must be returned at
the time of release).
-
Given individual privileges other than for reasons of health, sex, age,
military rank or professional qualifications.
-
Held in close confinement except for breaches of the law, although their
liberty can be restricted for security reasons.
-
Compelled to do military work, nor work which is dangerous, unhealthy or
degrading.
The
actions distributed from 'Marine A' clearly notify a violation in the
regulations of this specific convention. Nevertheless, we must examine the
facts at our disposal. Firstly, did the accused shoot dead a wounded individual
who would have been classed as and therefore become a PoW? Yes. Secondly, would
the 'victim', a Taliban insurgent, have tried to and, if given the chance,
inflict maximum damage onto British soldiers if presented with the opportunity
to do so? Yes. Thirdly, if wounded and if indeed captured, would British
Personnel be protected under the very same ‘Geneva Convention’ from an
organisation such as the Taliban, an organisation who have in the past video
taped and released public executions on not only soldiers, but on innocent
journalists and civilians also? Ah.
Prime
Minister David Cameron, along with multiple figures within the British Army,
have condoned the event which has been called 'murder.' Today the PM stated,
"We should not let that single incident besmirch the incredible work
the Royal Marines have done, not only over the decades but over the
centuries."
'Marine
A' will be sentenced on December 6th, 2013. The Royal Marines Sergeant could
possibly be facing a life sentence if found guilty of these so called ‘war
crimes.’
Should
'Marine A' receive a prison sentence? For some it is a highly grey
area. Do I personally condone this incident? I know I do not support any
form of murder. But there is something about this case, which doesn't resonate
the term 'murder.' The statement given by 'Marine A' after he shoots the
Taliban insurgent "There, shuffle off this mortal coil... It's nothing
you wouldn't do to us” I can’t help but concur, and can't understand anyone who
begins to disagree.
To
those individuals within our own society who believe that 'Marine A' was wrong
to kill this human being, you do have a point. Perhaps we should have taken the
'victim' captive, even though on the voice recording you can clearly hear all
present at the scene refuse to waste their medical supplies on the dying man.
Perhaps we should of saved his life, brought him back to a barrack, taken tax
payers hard-earned income to ensure that this danger's life span is preserved
by providing him with shelter, food and any other necessities, patched him up,
sent him on his way, only to later be responsible for another death that our
army would suffer.
On
the other hand, perhaps 'Marine A' was doing what he felt morally right. He put
the man out of his misery. Are we so naive to believe that this is the
first Taliban insurgent to be killed by our armed forces, even if they could of
become a PoW?
Our
country is at war, and has been for far too long. People die every day out
there, whether you're guilty or innocent, it doesn't matter as soon as a
bullet's in you. We all bleed the same way. But I ask, what would you have done
in a position such as the one 'Marine A' found himself in?
What
would you have done, if you was out there in that war zone, fearful to tread the
very ground underneath, due to the cowardly tactics used by the Taliban, who
plant unseen IED's that could tear your life away from you at a moments
notice.
What
would you have done, if you had seen brothers-in-arms killed over the course of
months and years, and personally seen the enemy take their limbs and hang them
from trees to taunt you?
What
would you have done, if you was a battle-hardened soldier such as 'Marine A', who
has served countless tours of Afghanistan, and who may be psychologically
damaged due to the sheer ungodly things experienced on the battlefield?
What
would you have done, whilst you wonder what the purpose of this war really
is and why you are really here, knowing that in the near future, if you’re
lucky to go home, that the very same place you have been trying to civilize is
more than likely going to slip back into a dystopia.
Now,
what would you have done?
I
personally feel disgusted to come from a country that is represented by people
who have turned their backs on this brave man, known as 'Marine A', and that
this story has been brought into the limelight so near Remembrance Sunday.
Tomorrow should be a day when we honor every serviceman or woman that have bravely
gone to war for us, especially the glorious dead who never returned. We
are so focused on this story at the present time that we also have seemed to
forget about the two monsters that murdered Drummer Lee Rigby in May of this
year, who was trying to receive donations for the ‘Help For Heroes’ campaign in
Woolwich. Why have they not yet been sentenced? Why has this specific case been
brought forward before theirs? Shouldn't we instead be trying to rid our
country of the very same evil that our soldier's overseas are bravely striving
to protect us from?
Is
this controversial? To me, not really, it's just a simple view of mine. Any
individual willing to go to war for this god-forsaken county is a Hero. It
seems to me that the government have just used 'Marine A' to cover their own
backs, willing to sacrifice this soldier to make an example out of him.
In
conclusion, there is in fact a small part of me that does believe 'Marine A'
should go to jail. At least in jail this Hero will have a roof over his head, a
daily source of food and four walls surrounding him, so that he is protected
from the harsh reality of society and how the British Government and Justice
System treat servicemen/women after they return home from war. At least he
won't be homeless. Homeless amongst thousands of other veterans in our country
who are left crippled with post-traumatic stress, which should be the main
concern of our attention. Instead we ignore them, we walk past their sleeping
bags on the streets, and we dehumanize them from existence.
Sadly,
this is the honest truth. We would rather spend our time and money on
witch-hunts in order to backstab the very best people we have to offer from
this country.
Give
him a medal, not a prison sentence.
Let
him remain a Hero within this sorrowful life.
If
you agree with this article please follow the link below and support this page. He fought for us, now we need to fight for him.
OR
Follow the link below to the official petition to free Marine A and sign it to show your support. Thank you. https://submissions.epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/56810
Follow the link below to the official petition to free Marine A and sign it to show your support. Thank you. https://submissions.epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/56810
Good reading
ReplyDelete